RIADeFi
Research files · Other

Ketju research: StarkGate (Starknet Bridge)

RejectedPublished by Ketju Research

This file describes the economic claim, control, loss, and exit evidence. Client action and amount belong to the advisor. Not investment, legal, tax, or compliance advice.

Research summary

The research assessment is adverse because of a recent reliability gap that has not yet been resolved, though this is the narrowest rejection in this batch. L2Beat confirms that Starknet is a Stage 1 ZK rollup, the same rating as Base. Its governance is comparably split between a 2-of-6 StarkWare multisig that sends normal actions through an eight-day on-chain timelock and a 9-of-12 Security Council that can upgrade instantly only in emergencies. Base, Arbitrum, and Optimism have the same zero-delay-once-invoked structure reflected in their registry caps. The incident record keeps Starknet at zero: mainnet halted twice in four months, in September 2025 and on 2026-01-05. Neither halt lost user funds, but both stopped block production. At this review, roughly seven clean months have passed since the later halt, short of the twelve-month bar this registry applies elsewhere. This is the bridges batch's closest case for a near-term reopen, not a structural disqualification.

Observable review triggers

  • Twelve consecutive months with no mainnet halt or block-production outage, counted from the 2026-01-05 incident
  • Any future major protocol upgrade is accompanied by a public pre-mortem or rollback plan, reducing recurrence risk
  • StarkWare Multisig or Security Council composition or threshold changes are publicly disclosed within 48 hours
  • Any confirmed exploit of the StarkGate bridge contracts themselves

Facts on file

Verdict
Rejected
Type
Other
Chains examined
Ethereum
Reviewed
Last confirmed

← All published rejections