RIADeFi
Research files · ETH staking

Ketju research: Renzo (ezETH liquid restaking)

RejectedPublished by Ketju Research

This file describes the economic claim, control, loss, and exit evidence. Client action and amount belong to the advisor. Not investment, legal, tax, or compliance advice.

Research summary

The research assessment is adverse. ezETH is a non-rebasing claim on Renzo's pooled ETH and stETH, restaked through EigenLayer across operators the team selects. Every control that matters sits with role holders, not with the token holder: the contracts are upgradeable behind a multisig whose threshold the documentation never states, no timelock is described, an oracle admin can repoint any collateral price feed, a pauser role can halt deposits and withdrawals, and a minter-burner role can burn ezETH from any holder's address with no allowance, a power the public repository shows and the user documentation never mentions. The protocol has one realized stress event on record: on 2024-04-24 ezETH traded to $688 on Uniswap against an ETH price above $3,100, leveraged holders were liquidated on Gearbox and Morpho, and no protocol withdrawal existed to hold the price to backing. Renzo revised its airdrop terms and never published a post-mortem. Deposits have since fallen from a self-reported $3.5B peak to about $113M. Direct ETH, Lido stETH or Rocket Pool rETH give a client the staking exposure without an administratively selected AVS loss surface, an unstated slashing waterfall, or a confiscation-capable role. The allocation is zero.

Observable review triggers

  • The multisig threshold, signers and an enforced timelock are published and reconcile to the deployed contracts for 12 consecutive months
  • A written slashing waterfall documents how validator and AVS losses distribute across holders and what funded capital absorbs them first
  • The burn-from-any-holder minter-burner power is removed or disclosed in user-facing documentation with a stated control
  • A post-mortem of the 2024-04-24 depeg publishes the price path, liquidations and the protocol's structural fix
  • Net restaking rewards exceed the approved plain-staking alternative by a written margin for 12 consecutive months, with a verifiable active bug bounty and proposed-size exits passing written time and slippage limits

Facts on file

Verdict
Rejected
Type
ETH staking
Chains examined
Ethereum
Reviewed
Last confirmed

← All published rejections